Yet, since Sep. 11, The Bush-Cheney team has not lifted a finger to
make us, or the Arab-Islamic world, less dependent on oil. Too bad.
Do
you think the unpopular Mullahs in Iran would be able to hold power
today if they didn't have huge oil revenues to finance their merchant
cronies and security services?
|
On a recent tour of India, I was visiting with an Indian Muslim community
leader, Syed Shahabuddin, and the conversation drifted to the question
of why the Muslim world seems so angry with the West. "Whenever I am
in America," he said, "people ask me, `Why do they hate us?' They don't
hate you. If they hated you, would they send their kids to be educated
by you? Would they look up to you as a model? They hate that you are
monopolizing all the nonrenewable resources [oil]. And because you want
to do that, you need to keep in power all your collaborators. As a consequence,
you support feudal elements who are trying to stave off the march of
democracy."
The more I've traveled in the Muslim world since 9/11, the more it has
struck me how true this statement is: Nothing has subverted Middle East
democracy more than the Arab world's and Iran's dependence on oil, and
nothing will restrict America's ability to tell the truth in the Middle
East and promote democracy there more than our continued dependence
on oil. Yet, since Sept. 11, the Bush-Cheney team has not lifted a finger
to make us, or the Arab-Islamic world, less dependent on oil. Too bad.
Because politics in countries dependent on oil becomes totally focused
on who controls the oil revenues ? rather than on how to improve the
skills and education of both their men and women, how to build a rule
of law and a legitimate state in which people feel some ownership, and
how to build an honest economy that is open and attractive to investors.
In short, countries with oil can flourish under repression ? as long
as they just drill a hole in the right place. Think of Saudi Arabia,
Libya or Iraq. Countries without oil can flourish only if they drill
their own people's minds and unlock their energies with the keys of
freedom. Think of Japan, Taiwan or India. Do you think the unpopular
Mullahs in Iran would be able to hold power today if they didn't have
huge oil revenues to finance their merchant cronies and security services?
Do you think Saudi Arabia would be able to keep most of its women unemployed
and behind veils if it didn't have petrodollars to replace their energies?
Do you think it is an accident that the most open and democratizing
Arab countries ? Lebanon, Jordan, Bahrain, Morocco, Dubai and Qatar
? are those with either no oil or dwindling oil reserves? They've had
to learn how to tap the talents of their people rather than their sand
dunes.
The Pentagon is now debating whether Saudi Arabia is our enemy. Yes
and no. There is a secularized, US-educated, pro-American elite and
middle class in Saudi Arabia, who are not America's enemies. They are
good people, and you can't visit Saudi Arabia without meeting them.
We should never forget that. But the Saudi ruling family stays in power
not by a democratic vote from these progressive. It stays in power through
a bargain with the conservative Wahhabi Muslim religious establishment.
The Wahhabi clerics bless the regime and give it legitimacy ? in the
absence of any democratic elections. In return, the regime gives the
Wahhabis oil money, which they use to propagate a puritanical version
of Islam that is hostile to the West, to women, to modernity and to
all non-Muslim faiths. This bargain suits the Saudi rulers well. If
they empowered the secularized, pro-American Saudis, it would not be
long before they demanded things like transparency in budgeting, accountability
and representation. The Wahhabi religious establishment, by contrast,
doesn't care how corrupt the ruling family is in private ? as long it
keeps paying off the clerics and gives them a free hand to impose Wahhabi
dogma on Saudi society, media and education, and to export it abroad.
So while there are many moderate Saudis who do not threaten us, there
is no moderate Saudi ruling bargain. The one that exists does threaten
us by giving huge oil resources to the Wahhabi conservatives, which
they use to build mosques and schools that preach against tolerance,
pluralism and modernity across the Muslim world ? and in America. And
it is our oil addiction that keeps us from ever confronting the Saudis
on this.
Addicts never tell the truth to their pushers. Until we face up to that?
and curb our consumption and encourage alternative energies that will
slowly bring the price of oil down and force these countries to open
up and adapt to modernity ? we can invade Iraq once a week and it's
not going to unleash democracy in the Arab world.
|
|